Supreme Court restores RPFC appeal filed a day late after NCLAT portal glitch

What is preserved

The source documents returned at the capture time have been retained privately (HTML, readable text or PDF). This is a webpage capture, not a complete copy of the publisher’s media or a platform export.

Litigant cannot be shown the door for NCLAT portal failure: Supreme Court restores appeal filed one day late

Bar & Bench · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:02 pm · text/html; charset=utf-8

SHA-256: 0d3cb7b6f3c9452b2e68d355dab40f385cccd255ce87a87ad962e77fe1f91b01

26d911b63ae846025750b6ec9330e7f9.pdf

ibbi.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:06 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: bcbd7cca7ff0f73f046f368c8981cc4bf6b78212ef3b648c8f25e2143eb15b98

Daily Orders

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:08 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 57c67cc625921d58314861f665130389e9512f8b31c61ebbd7321d34c739b765

5988_2026_4_22_71691_Judgement_01-Jun-2026.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:15 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: 8e8c84dac4aeb4301aea2226d21fff3229b2c4733b8deef25c3b31ff6061ac60

Home | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:17 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 8dc0d26e7ae59a4ac19864360b6bac0a84fdea7db6db44f9246e8ebc7e5281b3

5014_2025_7_46_64924_Order_10-Oct-2025.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:22 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: 243624af8324fbbc390f2d6c3b9a1dfcd3db65c2d35db6c18f84f9ee9471ce52

4355_2025_7_4_63973_Order_08-Sep-2025.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:23 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: 1ade8fe79a7361d9fcd585f09b38d8c0685479e44afbbc265536a6d4afb3b16c

72ea40b1a0cc3073ea140b2ca1df84ac.pdf

ibbi.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:25 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: 1806980e6d721b8d83654af5ba7f55e972699ea3733fd053255d288f60a2a3a7

Sitemap | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:26 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 0e8a42840d9c7fb6398b4b6f7a2ee155c5aeb667aa7f5b125fb67f23842dbbad

Help | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:26 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 76289d08d74adbea45f9fd9c70e12a6a305cf211ab0c2d76ff645a31241bc221

About NCLAT | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:27 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: d7bacbd1d31e81a4b46f5c8523dbbdf99193fb0c39311e208345e4730a70a419

About Chairperson | National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

nclat.nic.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 7:20:27 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 65b656064c7689a40650b2c459f2118eaa2083b28357a3c89e557d46aee337e0

Capture integrity

SHA-256: 0d3cb7b6f3c9452b2e68d355dab40f385cccd255ce87a87ad962e77fe1f91b01

A matching hash confirms that captured bytes have not changed. It does not establish that the publisher’s claims are true or that the page had this content before the capture date.

Limits of this record

Research coverage limit: Only one source — a Bar & Bench news report of September 17, 2026 — describes the Supreme Court's September 10 ruling and its directions. The underlying judgment text and the Supreme Court's own order were not captured, so the ruling's reasoning is presented as reported and not independently corroborated.

Topic mismatch flagged for the checker: the discovery title concerned a Supreme Court restoration of an appeal filed one day late due to NCLAT portal failure. None of the primary documents captured — the NCLAT orders, the NCLAT daily orders, the NCLAT website pages, the Supreme Court judgments/orders, or the IBBI-hosted NCLAT orders — addresses this specific case or its holding.

The primary documents captured concern unrelated matters: an NCLAT order on refiling delay in an Envirant Developers insolvency appeal; an NCLAT order rejecting condonation of delay in appeals; a Supreme Court judgment in CA Ramchandra Dallaram Choudhary v. Adani Infrastructure & Developers (P) Ltd. on re-filing delay under Section 62 IBC; and Supreme Court orders on contempt and on delay in an appeal under Section 61 IBC. Their subject matter overlaps with limitation issues but not with the specific portal-failure holding described in the story.

Ambiguity: the report states the Bench made the observation 'recently' and refers to a 'September 10 ruling' without specifying the year; the article itself is dated September 17, 2026. The report does not set out the exact statutory or rules provision under which the Court acted, and the feedback's question about whether the Court relied on Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the NCLAT rules, or a different power cannot be answered on the captured evidence.

The report does not describe the specific portal failure in technical detail beyond references to defects and OTP delivery problems on attempts of January 28 and 29, 2026, nor does it set out directions to the NCLAT registry beyond the Court's observation that the period could have been excluded.

No evidence of disagreement was found in the captured material, but absence of disagreement does not establish consensus; this limitation should be read against the single-source nature of the reporting.

Some candidate sources were inaccessible or outside the supported research domains; consult the capture log.

The original file is retained for editorial reference. Reproduction rights have not been established, so the raw capture is not publicly redistributed.