Apex court asks whether voters' party preference unsettles legislative-majority test in Shiv Sena dispute

What is preserved

The source documents returned at the capture time have been retained privately (HTML, readable text or PDF). This is a webpage capture, not a complete copy of the publisher’s media or a platform export.

Voters vote for party, not representative: Supreme Court questions legislative majority test in Shiv Sena dispute

Bar & Bench · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:33:24 pm · text/html; charset=utf-8

SHA-256: 71b646af7c5042d502460b90c9a472875173e7057670fb3057cfad90459d99e3

‘Need clarity on what constitutes majority within a political party’: SC remarks on row over Shiv Sena split | Legal News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:33:26 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 8c11caef6b88d20d77e94c79d9c284caaee98e0464021a22b66eb957dd3b3aee

‘Need clarity on what constitutes majority within a political party’: SC remarks on row over Shiv Sena split | Legal News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:33:36 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 384f55f9d8c18c4a179d0795dd4c0949d8138baad949bf194532f224181b4c4c

20234_2022_1_301_37640_Judgement_23-Aug-2022.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:33:50 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: d6514e38779d0127b9864a5d7f89f0c2af2942f0fcc613595bc1f8b613023e11

34108_2023_12_1502_46759_Judgement_06-Sep-2023.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:33:50 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: ff6ea03b17216ca41dd3dd1defc614cbd8fc19408c9ce1840e2a1bbcf5a94451

Capture integrity

SHA-256: 71b646af7c5042d502460b90c9a472875173e7057670fb3057cfad90459d99e3

A matching hash confirms that captured bytes have not changed. It does not establish that the publisher’s claims are true or that the page had this content before the capture date.

Limits of this record

Research coverage rests mainly on one legal-news outlet; the only other matched outlet is a duplicate URL of a separate report on an earlier hearing, so no independently corroborated account is available.

The two Indian Express captures concern an August 6, 2026 hearing, not the September 17, 2026 sitting, so they cannot be used to corroborate the later bench exchange.

A dedicated discovery channel was unavailable; the supplied 2022 and 2023 Supreme Court judgments concern unrelated matters — the Shiv Sena v. Governor batch and a Ladakh symbol dispute — and do not corroborate what was said in the September 2026 hearing.

The commissioning question asks which propositions of law the bench endorsed; the captures contain a mixture of judicial observations and counsel argument, and do not record a ruling, so the distinction cannot be resolved from the available record.

Uddhav Thackeray, Eknath Shinde and the Shiv Sena name and symbol are widely reported ongoing disputes; a separate story on the Shiv Sena split in The Hindu, captured during research, lies outside the supported source set.

Image candidates were all flagged permission-excluded, so no authentic event photography could be selected or verified for this report.

Some candidate sources were inaccessible or outside the supported research domains; consult the capture log.

The original file is retained for editorial reference. Reproduction rights have not been established, so the raw capture is not publicly redistributed.