INDIA-ROOTED. GLOBAL IN VIEW.Independent perspectives. Original sources.
Search
The Chitragupta ChronicleFOR THE RECORD OF OUR TIME
India/ Source brief

Son Petitions Supreme Court Over Mother Deported After Voter-Roll Deletion

Court issues notice to the Centre on a plea seeking the return of Sahida Fakir, whose counsel says she was pushed into Bangladesh after her SIR deletion; the underlying procedural record remains undisclosed.

Editorial illustration: A restrained editorial scene of administrative separation rather than a specific person or event: in the foreground on a plain, slightly worn wooden counter, two paper documents — a voter-roll page and a small identity-s
Text sizeAa 20 pixels

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice to the Central government on a petition by the son of a West Bengal woman, Sahida Fakir, who was pushed into Bangladesh after her name was deleted from the electoral roll during the special intensive revision, Bar & Bench reported. A Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana heard the plea seeking directions to bring her back to India. Senior Advocate S Muralidhar appeared for the petitioner. [1] [1]

According to the petition as reported, Fakir is a permanent resident of Gobindapur in North 24 Parganas district, with her grandfather's name in the 1952 electoral roll and her parents' names in the 2002 roll. She moved to Mumbai about 20 years ago and worked as a domestic worker. On July 19, persons in plain clothes identifying themselves as police took her to a holding centre in Chembur and seized her Aadhaar card and phone without a receipt, the report said. [1] [1]

The petition contended that no competent authority conducted a fair inquiry into her nationality, examined her records, gave her notice of the allegation, or an effective opportunity to establish citizenship before her liberty was deprived. After about five days she was handed to the BSF, flown toward the north-east and pushed across the border late at night with around 20 other detainees, and remains in temporary shelter there, it was submitted. The petitioner argued that deletion from the roll during the SIR does not determine citizenship and that an appeal against the deletion is pending. [1] [1]

The case sits against a broader record. In April 2026 the Supreme Court declined to entertain writ petitions from people aggrieved by roll deletions in West Bengal and directed them to appellate tribunals formed to hear such appeals; it said mere pendency of an appeal gives no right to vote. In June 2026 the same court asked a tribunal to decide expeditiously, preferably within two months, the appeal of an advocate deleted from the list. [4] [4] [5]

Sources & limitations

The research question asked for a document-grounded reconstruction of the procedural chain: which authority deleted the entry, on what stated basis, what notice and opportunity were given, and what the petition now asks. No captured source contains the administrative deportation record, the underlying SIR deletion order or file, the petitioner's court filing text, or any disclosed electoral-roll record. This brief therefore relays the petition's account as reported and cannot reconstruct the procedural chain the commissioning question sought.

The primary Supreme Court document captured (s-2a7e47059140748d) concerns a suo motu writ petition on the safety of judicial officers deputed for SIR work in West Bengal. It does not address the deportation or the Fakir case. That is a topic mismatch between the discovery title and this primary source.

The reported account is attributed to the petition; no state, BSF, or police response to the allegations is captured. It should not be read as established fact.

All media candidates carried permission status "excluded," so no visual was selected. No discovery-channel evidence was captured.

Dates and sequencing beyond those reported (July 19 detention; Thursday hearing) could not be independently confirmed from the captured material.

Some candidate sources were inaccessible or outside the supported research domains; consult the capture log.

[1] Bar & Bench · West Bengal woman deported to Bangladesh after SIR deletion; son moves Supreme Court ↗
17/9/2026 · Publisher reporting

[2] api.sci.gov.in · 19822_2026_1_51_69596_Order_02-Apr-2026.pdf ↗
Source date not supplied · Original document / statement

[3] indianexpress.com · Mother’s name deletion from voter list stalls son’s passport, Calcutta High Court steps in | Legal News - The Indian Express ↗
21/8/2026 · Publisher reporting

[4] newsonair.gov.in · SC declines pleas on WB voter roll deletion; directs petitioners to appellate tribunals | Akashvani News ↗
Source date not supplied · Original document / statement

[5] indianexpress.com · Supreme Court asks Tribunal hearing appeals against Bengal SIR deletions to expedite lawyer’s case | Legal News - The Indian Express ↗
20/6/2026 · Publisher reporting

[6] indianexpress.com · Will bring back Sunali Khatun, son from Bangladesh ‘on humanitarian grounds’, Centre tells SC | Legal News - The Indian Express ↗
3/12/2025 · Publisher reporting

[7] aljazeera.com · Millions in India’s Bengal risk losing welfare benefits over voter deletion | Food News | Al Jazeera ↗
30/6/2026 · Publisher reporting

[8] livemint.com · ‘Math isn’t mathing’: IIM Calcutta Prof shares shocking SIR voter deletion story ahead of West Bengal elections | Mint ↗
15/4/2026 · Publisher reporting

[9] newindianexpress.com · SIR impact on TMC-won assembly constituencies, including Bhabanipur, in the 2026 Bengal Polls ↗
5/5/2026 · Publisher reporting

View the preserved source record →

Version 2

Source records and any dated corrections accompany this article.

Corrections & clarifications

Continue reading

India desk