Son Petitions Supreme Court Over Mother Deported After Voter-Roll Deletion

What is preserved

The source documents returned at the capture time have been retained privately (HTML, readable text or PDF). This is a webpage capture, not a complete copy of the publisher’s media or a platform export.

West Bengal woman deported to Bangladesh after SIR deletion; son moves Supreme Court

Bar & Bench · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:21:35 pm · text/html; charset=utf-8

SHA-256: 0f89a2a7cbd89e71b27f4288cf5e167422642ef98c4791f5bcd166eb4b63909b

19822_2026_1_51_69596_Order_02-Apr-2026.pdf

api.sci.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:21:42 pm · application/pdf

SHA-256: 2a7e47059140748d0fe3e1dd4043999be191870ee76285ec896edfc5e2489105

Mother’s name deletion from voter list stalls son’s passport, Calcutta High Court steps in | Legal News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:22:02 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 3d004d23e3ad20d4e3138e40bb988a4b577cfe3a4259af7eb0f482d04fc069f7

SC declines pleas on WB voter roll deletion; directs petitioners to appellate tribunals | Akashvani News

newsonair.gov.in · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:22:04 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 6d6f9c29ebccb362e3072ddfbbd811667f940b0e455105d634e9f23c1e312abd

Supreme Court asks Tribunal hearing appeals against Bengal SIR deletions to expedite lawyer’s case | Legal News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:22:36 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: 6ff7abb16c64223eb19424c354a1d783923c726fe7f178cf6f8c77b6e3e22cab

Will bring back Sunali Khatun, son from Bangladesh ‘on humanitarian grounds’, Centre tells SC | Legal News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:22:36 pm · text/html; charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: d521f33228de728454e8522d6b2f7a4d5f6ccb3274d897ccb17eb3ee3d888761

Millions in India’s Bengal risk losing welfare benefits over voter deletion | Food News | Al Jazeera

aljazeera.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:23:11 pm · text/html; charset=utf-8

SHA-256: 810cfd42ee3eefcb702626f4eec9645e6be6ae2a10445b0b7c5c3b2663eabf20

‘Math isn’t mathing’: IIM Calcutta Prof shares shocking SIR voter deletion story ahead of West Bengal elections | Mint

livemint.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:23:12 pm · text/html;charset=UTF-8

SHA-256: d0dd5ff25b29b91266b13f52451d2e2f23f96a3a771d1a2deefd981a60580fae

SIR impact on TMC-won assembly constituencies, including Bhabanipur, in the 2026 Bengal Polls

newindianexpress.com · Original source ↗

Captured 17/9/2026, 8:23:13 pm · text/html; charset=utf-8

SHA-256: add45fcd4f95bc462c89a2e8ff4a2a63c208fd031884731bf5c0ad7c969553ac

Capture integrity

SHA-256: 0f89a2a7cbd89e71b27f4288cf5e167422642ef98c4791f5bcd166eb4b63909b

A matching hash confirms that captured bytes have not changed. It does not establish that the publisher’s claims are true or that the page had this content before the capture date.

Limits of this record

The research question asked for a document-grounded reconstruction of the procedural chain: which authority deleted the entry, on what stated basis, what notice and opportunity were given, and what the petition now asks. No captured source contains the administrative deportation record, the underlying SIR deletion order or file, the petitioner's court filing text, or any disclosed electoral-roll record. This brief therefore relays the petition's account as reported and cannot reconstruct the procedural chain the commissioning question sought.

The primary Supreme Court document captured (s-2a7e47059140748d) concerns a suo motu writ petition on the safety of judicial officers deputed for SIR work in West Bengal. It does not address the deportation or the Fakir case. That is a topic mismatch between the discovery title and this primary source.

The reported account is attributed to the petition; no state, BSF, or police response to the allegations is captured. It should not be read as established fact.

All media candidates carried permission status "excluded," so no visual was selected. No discovery-channel evidence was captured.

Dates and sequencing beyond those reported (July 19 detention; Thursday hearing) could not be independently confirmed from the captured material.

Some candidate sources were inaccessible or outside the supported research domains; consult the capture log.

The original file is retained for editorial reference. Reproduction rights have not been established, so the raw capture is not publicly redistributed.